College Professor Grilled by the FBI about Fracking Resistance

29 Mar

Cross Posted from NTDaily.com

An FBI agent and a Dallas police officer spoke last month with philosophy and religion professor Adam Briggle about specific materials in a syllabus for one of his courses on civil disobedience.

Law enforcement officials brought up an article in his curriculum that supports “monkeywrenching,” an act of sabotaging equipment performed by activists to stop projects they deem damaging to the environment.

Briggle believed the FBI agent and officer were only seeking information.

“They told me they are acting proactively and preventatively to smell out any signs of trouble for any potential eco-terrorist strikes revolving around the gas drilling issue on the Barnett Shale,” Briggle said.

The FBI agent referenced a chapter from the book “Ecodefense: A Field Guide to Monkeywrenching.” The first chapter, by Dave Foreman, calls on individuals “to act heroically in defense of the wild, to put a monkeywrench into the gears of the machine that is destroying natural diversity.”

“I told the FBI guy I counsel my students to break the law; just the unjust laws,” Briggle said. “As Foreman says, and Martin Luther King said, and Gandhi said, it should be a very serious and prolonged process to make sure you’ve gone through all the legal means first. That’s a very difficult thing to find out: what is an unjust law?”

The agent and police officer repeated several times that they supported free speech as protected in the First Amendment but explained there is a difference between protesting and violence.

“At one point they asked me, ‘Have you heard anything about IEDs [improvised explosive devices]?’” Briggle said.

Click here to read more

One Response to “College Professor Grilled by the FBI about Fracking Resistance”

  1. dennis stankie April 11, 2012 at 12:47 pm #

    “Fracking bill moves forward in California Legislature
    April 10, 2012 | 7:35 pm 161

    With oil companies touting the potential of hydraulic fracturing in California, state lawmakers considered the first of several bills Tuesday to address the controversial oil extraction method commonly known as “fracking.”

    The Senate Natural Resources Committee passed a measure that would require energy firms to notify property owners before using the procedure near their land.

    Fracking, which involves injecting chemical-laced water and sand into the ground to break apart rock and release natural gas and oil, has drawn the greatest attention in the Rocky Mountain West and Northeast, where states have debated moratoriums to develop regulations after toxic chemicals were found in nearby drinking water.

    While fracking is widely used in California to tap oil deposits, state regulators have yet to develop rules or reporting requirements, causing growing anxiety in communities across the state.

    On Tuesday, state Sen. Fran Pavley (D-Agoura Hills) described her notification bill as the “necessary first step to begin collecting data on fracking in California.” She said oil companies would have to give their neighbors 30-days notice before fracking, “just like you would be expecting your neighbor to put up a sign if they were adding a second story” to their house.

    “The purpose of this bill is not to stop fracking,” Pavley said. “It’s a good-government kind of approach.”

    Representatives from the oil industry opposed the measure, saying they supported separate legislation that requires public disclosure within 60 days after fracking.

    “We support disclosure. We support transparency. We believe in the technology,” said Paul Deiro, a lobbyist for the Western States Petroleum Assn. But, he added, “pre-notification is a step too far.”

    Deiro said the advance notice would reveal proprietary information and undercut competitive advantages for oil companies. He also said the legislation would hurt the flexibility of energy firms who are at the whims of the service contractors they hire to operate wells.

    The Democratic bill passed on a party-line vote, 5-3. It now moves to the Senate Environmental Quality Committee.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: